Comments on: Post-Debate Recap http://inatheistbus.org/2009/10/20/post-debate-recap/ Bringing the Atheist Bus to Indiana Sun, 19 Sep 2010 03:03:24 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8 hourly 1 By: Jordan http://inatheistbus.org/2009/10/20/post-debate-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-12147 Jordan Sun, 19 Sep 2010 03:03:24 +0000 http://inatheistbus.org/?p=361#comment-12147 You Can Be Good Without God. But Most People Arent. God Takes The People who arent good and Cleans them up. lets say your right. all the christian and god belivers would be living this good life doing good things. so then we just lived a good life to be proud of. but wait lets say there is a god and heaven and hell and all you people that dont belive are going to die and go to hell. see that doesnt scare people because you guys dont understand what hell will really be like. its so hot that the fire burns black and your skins litteraly melts off you over and over again and your stand in a lake of fire and cant escape and your in that for eternalty. who in there right mind would really wanna take that chance? You Can Be Good Without God. But Most People Arent.
God Takes The People who arent good and Cleans them up.

lets say your right. all the christian and god belivers would be living this good life doing good things.
so then we just lived a good life to be proud of.

but wait lets say there is a god and heaven and hell and all you people that dont belive are going to die and go to hell.
see that doesnt scare people because you guys dont understand what hell will really be like. its so hot that the fire burns black and your skins litteraly melts off you over and over again and your stand in a lake of fire and cant escape and your in that for eternalty.

who in there right mind would really wanna take that chance?

]]> By: Linda http://inatheistbus.org/2009/10/20/post-debate-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-5325 Linda Fri, 05 Feb 2010 04:19:35 +0000 http://inatheistbus.org/?p=361#comment-5325 You're all going to burn in hell. You’re all going to burn in hell.

]]> By: GeorgeRic http://inatheistbus.org/2009/10/20/post-debate-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-3261 GeorgeRic Mon, 26 Oct 2009 23:12:38 +0000 http://inatheistbus.org/?p=361#comment-3261 Of course you can be good and not believe in God. Of course, there is a problem in 'what is good?' The debate on killing babies is a prime example of the problem. It pleases me to let open-minded people know about new ways of pondering about the age-old questions. With the existence of 'Techie Worlds' (available at amazon.com) believers in Christianity can hold their views utilizing sound logic, clear thinking and a mechanistic view of worlds. Applying Flatland's concept of contiguous dimensional worlds, Trinity, Resurrection, Judgment and soul are sensible and mechanically viable beliefs. 'Techie Worlds' follows that rule of science by which individual details are tested for their conformity to the overarching hypothesis. Admittedly, agnostics may choose not to follow such obvious and sensible logic, but no longer can they denigrate believers for fuzzy thinking. Moslems and pagans who read and understand the sound logic of the Flatland concept must adopt the reasonable Trinitarian view. 'Techie Worlds' will make them abandon the ways of terror an adopt the way of love. Techie Worlds is not standard preacher-prattle. Only by reading it can you open your mind to its valid way of understanding Christianity. GeorgeRic Of course you can be good and not believe in God. Of course, there is a problem in ‘what is good?’ The debate on killing babies is a prime example of the problem.
It pleases me to let open-minded people know about new ways of pondering about the age-old questions. With the existence of ‘Techie Worlds’ (available at amazon.com) believers in Christianity can hold their views utilizing sound logic, clear thinking and a mechanistic view of worlds. Applying Flatland’s concept of contiguous dimensional worlds, Trinity, Resurrection, Judgment and soul are sensible and mechanically viable beliefs. ‘Techie Worlds’ follows that rule of science by which individual details are tested for their conformity to the overarching hypothesis. Admittedly, agnostics may choose not to follow such obvious and sensible logic, but no longer can they denigrate believers for fuzzy thinking. Moslems and pagans who read and understand the sound logic of the Flatland concept must adopt the reasonable Trinitarian view. ‘Techie Worlds’ will make them abandon the ways of terror an adopt the way of love. Techie Worlds is not standard preacher-prattle. Only by reading it can you open your mind to its valid way of understanding Christianity.
GeorgeRic

]]> By: 4Him http://inatheistbus.org/2009/10/20/post-debate-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-3260 4Him Mon, 26 Oct 2009 22:08:38 +0000 http://inatheistbus.org/?p=361#comment-3260 Thank you for the debate. However, Dan Barker was very offensive while Dan Waugh kept only to his belief and what Christ followers believe instead of bashing atheist. Dan Barker was very disrespectful by calling Christians idiots and never directly answered questions that were posed by Waugh (like a real policitian). Thank you for the debate. However, Dan Barker was very offensive while Dan Waugh kept only to his belief and what Christ followers believe instead of bashing atheist. Dan Barker was very disrespectful by calling Christians idiots and never directly answered questions that were posed by Waugh (like a real policitian).

]]>